Infowars newsletters

Eyewitness on Underwear Bomber Trial, Peter Schiff, QE3, Gardasil Vaccines & More: Infowars Nightly News
Watch Tuesdays show

GARDASIL: GOVERNMENT MANDATED POISON

On this edition of the Infowars Nightly News, Alex Jones covers more on the Gardasil Vaccine controversy, an issue that has inflamed Big Pharma-friendly doctors since Congresswoman Michele Bachmann and Congressman Ron Paul have brought up Gov. Rick Perry's close ties with Merck during GOP debates.

Alex also speaks with eyewitness Kurt Haskell with the latest on the Underwear bomber trial, which is slated to begin jury selection after Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was ruled competent to stand trial. Haskell famously witnessed a 'sharp-dressed man' helping Abdulmutallab get on-board the plane, and despite being attacked by authorities, was later vindicated as correct.

Alex then speaks with economic expert Peter Schiff on QE3 and his recent testimony before Congress warning about the economy and the government's inept attempt to create jobs through a stimulus. Instead, it is irresponsible monetary and fiscal policy that is undermining employment in America, according to Schiff.

During the news blitz, Alex covers Big Sis' launch of coffee cups tagged with a Big Brother eye and an appeal to report suspicious behavior on behalf of the Department of Homeland Security. He also covers the Homeland Security and FBI raid on IHOPs in Ohio and Indiana over allegations of money laundering and undocumented workers. Alex then discusses more on vaccines, including the ties to media mogul Rupert Murdoch.

Clips from Ed Asner's appearance today on the Alex Jones Show will also be featured, including his involvement in the powerful new documentary 9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out on WTC Building 7 and other aspects of 9/11.

Infowars Nightly News streams live every week day at 7 PM CST and is available for Prison Planet.tv subscribers.

Watch this episode for free here and share it with your friends.


Gardasil: Cancer Bioweapon Under Scrutiny
By Kurt Nimmo

In response to Rep. Michele Bachmann's documented claim that Gardasil is dangerous, the establishment media has launched into overdrive in a frantic effort to discredit her and hide the truth from the American people.

Bachmann's comments have provided Big Pharma with an excuse to launch another of its profitable propaganda campaigns.

"In the aftermath of Rep. Michele Bachmann's comments about the Gardasil shot causing mental retardation, vaccine lobbyists and the pharmaceutical-friendly establishment media have launched a new hoax claiming the vaccine is completely safe, despite the CDC's own figures confirming over 18,000 cases of adverse reactions," writes Paul Joseph Watson.

Outrageous claims of the vaccine's safety are dispelled by a number of experts and even the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, as Watson notes, but this has not given pause to cheerleaders in the establishment media as they push this eugenics bioweapon on a largely unsuspecting public.

"The FDA adverse event reports on the HPV vaccine read like a catalog of horrors," Judicial Watch quoted Tom Fitton as saying in 2007 following the FDA's approval of Gardasil. "Any state or local government now beset by Merck's lobbying campaigns to mandate this HPV vaccine for young girls ought to take a look at these adverse health reports."

In addition to autism, the vaccine causes a number of side effects the media sidesteps. "Side effects published by Merck & Co. warn the public about potential pain, fever, nausea, dizziness and itching after receiving the vaccine. Indeed, 77% of the adverse reactions reported are typical side effects to vaccinations. But other more serious side effects reported include paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and seizures," reports LifeSiteNews.

LifeSiteNews and Merck have neglected to mention the most serious "side effect" associated with the Gardasil vaccination - death.

SANE Vax, a non-profit organization dedicated to providing information on the dangers of vaccinations, discovered that Gardasil samples were contaminated with rDNA of the Human Papillomavirus and the HPV was "firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant" in the vaccine, according to Dr. Sin Hang Lee.

"With the added discovery that the aluminum adjuvant also carries rDNA fragments of two different strains of Human Papillomavirus, this now reaches the level of a dangerous biohazard -- something more like a biological weapon rather than anything resembling medicine," writes Mike Adams for Natural News.

In short, this supposed vaccine is more dangerous than the disease it claims to address. It resembles a bioweapon more than a preventive vaccine.

None of these concerns are addressed by the establishment media as it continues its dishonest and one-sided campaign to discredit critics of vaccines and also exploit the controversy to criticize Rep. Michele Bachmann and lampoon her as a loon.

Infowars.com
****
Alex Jones' Nightly News: The Infowar Taken to the Next Level
A Chronicle of Dirty Tricks Against Ron Paul

The establishment is terrified that the liberty-driven Congressman has entered the 'top tier'
By Paul Joseph Watson

Now that the establishment media has been forced to concede that Ron Paul is a top tier candidate for the Republican nomination, having initially tried to ignore his campaign altogether, expect the smears, dirty tricks and hit pieces against the Texan Congressman to intensify.

In this article, we're going to take a brief look at some of the attacks on Ron Paul that we have documented over the last several years.

    * The most recent example occurred earlier this week. The corporate press attempted to portray Ron Paul as anti-American simply for pointing out the fact that having military bases and occupying armies in foreign countries increases the risk of terrorist attacks. Despite the smear, reality shows that Ron Paul has received more money in donations from active duty military personnel than all of the other Republican candidates combined and more than Barack Obama himself, and his views on foreign occupations are supported by the very U.S. troops that neo-cons constantly invoke to support maintaining such foreign occupations.
    * Even as Ron Paul won every debate poll and performed well in national polls, the mainstream media admitted that there was a deliberate talking point to exclude his campaign from discussion. After pointing out that Ron Paul only lost to Michele Bachmann by a tiny percentage (and that after accusations that Bachmann's campaign attempted to rig the result by buying 4,000 votes), and that the Ames result was virtually a "tie for first," Politico's Roger Simon said the reason for him being ignored was that "the media doesn't believe he has a hoot in hells chance of winning the Iowa caucuses, the Republican nomination or winning the presidency, so we're gonna ignore him." CNN host Howard Kurtz even admitted that, "We are in the business of kicking candidates out of the race".
    * In February, Fox News claimed that a technical error was responsible for them playing old footage which contained audio of booing as Ron Paul was announced as the winner of the 2011 CPAC poll. In a shocking act of mass public deception, Fox News attempted to skew Ron Paul's 2011 CPAC straw poll win by representing it with footage from the previous year's CPAC event, at which Mitt Romney supporters had loudly booed the result and Paul supporters had been absent due to a Campaign for Liberty meeting running late

Indeed, Fox News has a history of smearing and sidelining Ron Paul, but this editorial policy is routinely passed off as a "mistake" of one kind or another.

Was it another "mistake" to omit Paul's name entirely from a Fox News survey that asked who would make the best president? Was it a "mistake" that relative nobodies like John Thune and Jon Huntsman were included in the Fox poll and yet Paul was blacklisted entirely despite his CPAC success two years running?

Was it another "mistake" on behalf of Fox News to exclude Paul from a January 6 2008 presidential forum event because they saw the prospect of anti-war opinions being voiced by the most conservative member of the House as a "threat"?

Was it a "mistake" for Fox News to claim that their own May 2007 presidential poll, which Ron Paul won, was unreliable, because online Paul supporters had skewed the result, despite the fact that the survey was conducted via cell phone text messaging and no online votes were taken?

Was it a mere "mistake" for Fox News host Sean Hannity to deride the Texas Congressman's runaway success in the text messaging poll as nothing more than "Paulites" flood voting, when in reality only one vote per cell phone number was allowed? Hannity's contention that Ron Paul supporters were simply dialing in over and over again was nothing more than a brazen lie intended to dismiss the Congressman's widespread popularity. No one at Fox News bothered to correct Hannity and no retraction was issued.

Was it another "mistake" when Fox News started editing Ron Paul's name out of Associated Press stories they syndicated before the 2008 presidential campaign?

Was it a "mistake" for Fox News to denigrate the fact that Ron Paul received the most campaign donations from members of the U.S. military by attributing it to "libertarian mailing lists"?

Was it a "mistake" when Fox News attempted to smear Ron Paul for having the audacity to appear on the Alex Jones Show and the nerve to merely converse with people who commit the thought crime of not completely trusting the official government version of 9/11?

Was it a "mistake" when Fox News rigged the structure of their entire May 2007 presidential debate and used it as a vehicle for all the other candidates to viciously attack Ron Paul, while Fox's pre-screened audience rapaciously applauded calls for torture and warmongering?

Was it a "mistake" when Fox News directors conspired to censor Ron Paul supporters from appearing in camera shots during the Mackinac Republican Conference on September 22, 2007, when they were caught on film stating, "I don't want these Ron Paul people, but I need shots of audience"?

Was it a "mistake" for Fox News to ignore a story every other news outlet was obliged to report, the record-breaking $4.2 million in campaign donations that Ron Paul achieved in a single day, while instead choosing to obsess about a man in Texas who sat in a bath tub full of snakes?

However, smear attacks against Ron Paul have come from both the phony right and the phony left.

    * In 2007, neo-con blowhard Glenn Beck, then a host with CNN, smeared Ron Paul supporters as terrorists, calling them a "physical threat" who should be dealt with by the U.S. military because they are causing Americans to be disenfranchised with the government.
    * MSNBC has also routinely attacked Ron Paul as well as his son, Senator Rand Paul. The network consistently shunned the Congressman during the 2008 debates, giving him less than half the time received by the other candidates. MSNBC also ignored Ron Paul's debate victory last week in its own poll, while inaccurately depicting the margin of his victory over the other candidates.

This list of smear attacks is likely to grow much larger the nearer we get to the Republican nomination in 2012. However, now that the establishment is so discredited, their dirty tricks against Paul are having less and less impact, while the Congressman's national polling figures continue to improve week by week.

Infowars.com
****
Alex rolls out his Infowars Nightly News this evening. The 30 minute television show will be packed with the sort of cutting edge and high caliber information, guests, and ground-breaking interviews Alex's audience has come to expect. The new show, scheduled to air every week night at 7 PM CST, will be available only to Prison Planet.tv subscribers, who will be able to access a full on-demand archive of the show.

Alex takes his operation to the next level with high quality production values and a wide array of new guests and hosts. No other alternative media news operation currently offers a nightly news show with this range of guests and news features.

The corporate media may produce televised shows that are more slick with their million-plus dollar budgets and large staffs, but none offer the sort of important and often breaking news Alex Jones will offer every weekday evening.

It is important that all serious supporters of alternative media back this effort and subscribe to Prison Planet.tv, a venue also offering hundreds of hours of archived video, documentaries, and radio show audio files.


In addition to the new nightly show, Alex has revamped the Prison Planet.tv website and has added new content sections, including Special Reports featuring reports focusing on breaking news stories and an Alex Rants section of impromptu videos of Alex covering a wide variety of issues as an addendum to his regular show.

We could not do any of this without you. Infowars is not a sprawling transnational entertainment corporation with a fantastic budget. It is a modest effort comparatively speaking, although the content is unrivaled and cannot be found anywhere else. No coiffured teleprompter readers will recite scripts from the Pentagon and Wall Street on Alex Jones' Nightly News.

Alex Jones takes the delivery of alternative news to the next level. Be part of the revolution and support the next phase in truth news. Subscribe to Prison Planet.tv today.


Critically Wounded Establishment Defends 9/11 Lie
by Kurt Nimmo

The Daily Mail in the UK has pointed to a BBC program on 9/11 conspiracy theories and Alex Jones in an article that cites a survey claiming that one in seven Americans believe the government had something to do with the attacks.

The poll was carried out as part of a BBC series The Conspiracy Files - Ten Years On. The survey asked the following question: "It is generally accepted that these attacks were carried out by Al Qaeda. However some people have suggested there was a wider conspiracy that included the American government. Do you, yourself, believe that there was a wider conspiracy, or not?"

The sixteen percent who said the government was involved in the attack is small enough for the corporate media and the government to write them off as conspiracy nuts.

The Daily Mail and the BBC did not cite previous polls that produced different results. A Zogby poll conducted in 2004 in New York revealed that 49 percent of New York City residents and 41 percent of New York state residents believe individuals within government "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act."

Two years later, in May of 2006, Zogby conducted another survey on 9/11. It revealed that 42% of Americans believe the government engaged in a cover-up of what really happened on September 11, 2001.

The following year another Zogby poll showed that 51% of Americans wanted Congress to investigate Bush and Cheney regarding the 9/11 attacks and over 30% called for immediate impeachment.

Other corporate polls reveal similar results with between 22 and 15 percent believing the government had advance knowledge of the attacks. Polls conducted in Asia and the Middle East show an even higher precentage of people who believe the government had something to do with the attacks.

The BBC program attributes leadership of the 9/11 truth movement to Alex Jones. "Private, corporate, world networks working in US, British, Israeli intelligence - all three groups - have been found to have fingerprints but the main driver was rogue networks at the top of the US Government," they quote him as stating, thus framing Jones within the "conspiracy theory" minority established by the BBC poll. "The Government admits they've staged events before. The official story doesn't add up."

The Daily Mail dismisses Jones by saying the "view is taken despite a series of official inquiries which have found no evidence to support the claims." In short, according to the Daily Mail and the BBC, the government is the final arbiter, not a preponderance of evidence to the contrary.

The Daily Mail and the BBC then pose and answer a number of questions – many easily refuted – that claim to debunk the "conspiracy theories."

For instance, the BBC insists on clinging to the widely discredited theory that Building 7 collapsed due to fire, making it the first skyscraper in modern times to collapse primarily as a result of a fire. NIST (The National Institute of Standards and Technology) issued a report claiming WTC 7 collapsed after seven hours of fire, although larger fires (for instance, the 1991 One Meridian Plaza fire in Philadelphia, which raged for 18 hours and gutted 8 floors) have not brought down steel frame skyscrapers.

The establishment is desperate to minimize the 9/11 truth movement and portray it as a small number of lunatics as the tenth anniversary rolls around.

In the days ahead, the corporate media will use the anniversary to disseminate war on terror propaganda. 9/11 truth stands in the way of that effort and that is why the BBC and the corporate media are releasing stories and television programs designed to pigeonhole and marginalize the truth movement.

****
Flash Mobs and the Ruling Elite Plan to Control the Internet
by Kurt Nimmo

In 2007, the British Ministry of Defense envisioned a distant dystopian future when "growing pervasiveness of information communications technology will enable states, terrorists or criminals, to mobilize 'flashmobs', challenging security forces to match this potential agility coupled with an ability to concentrate forces quickly in a small area," according to the Guardian.

The MoD's Development, Concepts & Doctrine Center speculated that 30 years in the future the "middle classes could become a revolutionary class, taking the role envisaged for the proletariat by Marx" in response to economic catastrophe and use flashmob techniques to challenge the police and military.

The British Ministry of Defense didn't have to wait 30 years for "flashmobs" to challenge so-called security services. The paralyzing riots now striking London and beyond are in large part organized via BlackBerry and its message network, BBM. Unlike Twitter and Facebook, the BBM network is anonymous and cannot be traced by the police.
Infowars.com

"Rather than shouting through a megaphone — as in the infamous 1985 riots on the Broadwater Estate in Tottenham — today's rabble rousers are more likely to organize online and with the aid of their iPhones and BlackBerrys," Time notes.

On August 9, David Lammy, the U.K.'s intellectual property minister, called for a temporary end to BlackBerry services to stop rioters from using BBM to organize and stage events, according to Bloomberg.

The flash mob phenomenon is cited as a contributing factor in a curfew imposed on young people in Philadelphia, violence during a 4th of July event in the Cleveland suburb of Shaker Heights, and fights at a fair in Milwaukee.

Not mentioned in all this sensationalistic coverage of violent teens and racial incidents is the fact that Facebook, Twitter, and instant messaging are routinely used by non-violent political activists. Despite the overt character of mindless terror and senseless property damage during the London riots, many of the messages appearing on Twitter and Facebook voice opposition to the police, a fact downplayed by the corporate media.

The initial catalyst for the violence now wracking London and environs was the shooting of a black man, Mark Duggan. The authorities claimed Duggan died in an "exchange of fire" with police, but that account now appears to be a fabrication by the police. The mindless violence, vandalism, and thievery has as its genesis an opposition to heavy-handed police behavior.

Once again, the internet and new technologies are being demonized by the state and its corporate media. It is part of an ongoing and persistent coordinated effort to impose restrictions on new media, not because they facilitate violence but because the political opposition to the establishment is effectively using the medium to organize resistance and counter propaganda disseminated by the elite.

The British Ministry of Defense prognostication that communications technology would pose a threat to the military and the state was off by almost two and a half decades. The middle class will not likely convert to Marxism, but it will increasingly use new technology to circumvent the corporate media megaphone that grows weaker by the day.

Short of shutting down the internet or neutering it with burdensome regulations, the medium will become the Achilles' heel of the ruling elite. Lurid stories of rampaging kids with BlackBerrys in hand will not change the reality of the situation or blunt the determination of those of us sincerely interested in change.